Boston Brewin’: Some thoughts on the Cup

The Boston Bruins sent their city into a frenzy on Wednesday night when they dominated the Vancouver Canucks 4-0 in Game 7 to win their sixth Stanley Cup. Given Boston’s long sports history and its fans’ general fervor, it’s not surprising to read numerous accounts reminiscing on their personal relationships with hockey and the Bruins. The “Win it For…” thread on Sons of Sam Horn is chockablock with touching stories of parents, brothers, friends, and coaches who instilled in the forum’s posters a love for hockey and the Bruins. While not as long or quite as tragic as the Red Sox’s 86-year drought, the Bruins’ 39 years without a Cup inspired much of the same feelings in their supporters, and indeed, that thread is a homage to a similar thread in 2004.

I don’t have the personal connection to hockey or the Bruins that many others do. Not that I’m a bandwagon fan or anything—as with every sport I follow, I pay pretty close attention to the team and watch most regular season (and all playoff) games. But I never played hockey growing up, and I certainly feel like an outsider cheering along with guys and gals who got up early every day for practice and have been involved in rock ‘em sock ‘em battles of their own.*

While I can’t identify with the players who have worked their whole lives for the Cup, or the fans who wanted their Bruins to “Win it for” their die-hard father, mother, or Bobby Orr-idolizing grandfather, there are some qualities that this Bruins team embodies that everyone can admire.

Last year the Bruins became the first team in U.S. pro sports since 2004 and just the 4th of all time to blow a 3-0 series lead. While there were plenty of injuries for Boston—and Philadelphia was a very strong team in their own right (making at all the way to Game 6 of the Finals)—this was a huge disappointment, and many in Boston were calling for major changes. President Cam Neely and the rest of the Bruins’ front office stayed the course and kept the same coach, general manager, and the same core of players. At numerous points both in this year’s regular season and postseason, they faced adversity, and every time they responded. In the first round of the playoffs, they were down two games to none against bitter rival Montreal after captain Zdeno Chara had to sit out Game 2 with dehydration. They then scored the first three goals on the road in Game 3, winning it 4-2 to get themselves back in it. They were down 3-1 in Game 4 of that same series, looking at trailing the series 3-1. They won that game 5-4 in OT. In Game 2 of the next round against Philadelphia, they were down 2-0 after just ten minutes, but Tim Thomas saved the next 46 shots and Boston won in overtime. In Game 4 of the Eastern Conference Finals, they gave up a three-goal lead and a chance to take a 3-1 lead against the Tampa Bay Lightning, but rallied to win the next game and eventually that series. And last, but probably most important, they fell down two games to none in the final and lost one of their best players, Nathan Horton, to an illegal hit, but rallied to win that game 8-1 and from that hit on outscored the Canucks 21-4.

As much as I’m inclined to disbelieve stories of motivation and leadership, it’s certainly believable that this team learned from adversity and made the extra effort and teamwork needed to win the Cup. Clichéd narratives like this make much more sense in a game like hockey where positioning, passing, and effort are so important, where there are players whose job it is to antagonize teams into taking bad penalties, or where teams will hit another guy just to make sure he’s tough enough. In hockey, if you don’t stand up for yourself** or have a teammate to stand up for you, you won’t last very long.

The Bruins’ teamwork, determination, and effort stand in stark contrast to their opponents in the final, who crossed numerous “hockey code” lines by diving, inflicting, or attempting cheap, dangerous hits and who blamed everyone but themselves for their failures during the series. The Bruins were able to remain smart and not get drawn into any wars of words, nor did they take any retaliatory penalties, even though it certainly must have been tempting. While they weren’t saints (Brad Marchand, I’m looking in your direction), they remained focused in a situation where a less driven team (and perhaps previous versions of the Bruins) may have lost their cool. And in the end, the team was rewarded and their fans can be proud.

*I think a big reason that hockey is such an insular game is that there’s a distinct difference between watching and playing it. The hardest part of the game for me to learn was the “code” involved in fighting, chirping, and post-whistle scrums. For someone who never competed on the ice, it doesn’t make a lot of sense that it’s OK for guys to simply throw down during a game, and I’m sure I still don’t comprehend the tremendous physicality involved in the game, as I’ve never taken a check or a slash. It’s another reason why hockey in warm-weather areas may just not work, as people in Florida didn’t grow up lacing them up every day (whether on a team or on the local pond).

**A really great anecdote from Elliotte Friedman’s always-interesting column: “It was 1996 when Chara first arrived in Canada, joining the WHL’s Prince George Cougars as a 19-year-old. Stan Butler, who coached that team, said the big Slovak was challenged to a fight three seconds into his first shift. He destroyed the guy. After he got out of the penalty box, someone else dropped the gloves. Chara won that, too. During the first intermission, Butler asked him if he’d ever fought before. The answer was no.” This illustrates both hockey’s unwritten rules and the toughness of Chara and the Bruins.

***Photo via Boston.com Big Shots by Mike Blake 

Bullied: The 2010-2011 Boston Celtics Eulogy

At least it ended in a good way. LeBron went off, dropped the dagger, beat his chest, and acted like he had gotten further than the Eastern Conference Finals and like Dwayne Wade wasn’t the main reason for it. Wait, this isn’t a particularly good end. But it’s better than what I had envisioned, which was a game 7 loss, perhaps in overtime, as Lebron or Wade drove to the lane possession after possession, consistently drawing fouls while similar play on the other end went unrewarded. Or one of the Heat stars accidentally-on-purpose knocking a Celtic down and injuring him. Or maybe the refs overstepping their bounds and throwing a Celtic out of a crucial game for using bad language, which is technically in the rulebook but if applied fairly would mean nearly every player (except maybe Ray Allen and A.C. Green) would get tossed from every game.

With the way games one through three went, these scenarios weren’t even a fantasy. They actually happened. Now, no one wants to be the one who complains about the refs. “Only losers whine about that.” And yes, that’s true, and it’s unbecoming, but it also assumes a base level of competence from the officials. When the officials are decent and a losing fan complains about a borderline call, that’s whining. But in a series reffed the way this one was, it’s simply being realistic to discuss the effect the officiating had on the series. Consider:

In five games, Miami attempted 47 more free throws than Boston. So nearly ten per game. It’s generally accepted that the Celtics are more of a jump-shooting team, while the Heat like to go hard to the basket, so maybe this disparity isn’t surprising. But adding up the totals by shot type (according to CBS Sports), the Celtics actually attempted 108 layups and 18 dunks, while Miami only attempted 95 layups and 16 dunks. I’m willing to buy that Miami’s drives to the hoop were more likely to draw a foul, given James’ and Wade’s playing styles, but not so much more likely as to warrant such a disparity.

I was also pretty unhappy about Dwayne Wade pulling Rajon Rondo down and injuring his elbow, rendering him pretty ineffective for the next two games. Rondo is of course the Celtics’ biggest offensive weapon, and as we saw in previous playoffs, he has a tendency to turn up his game when the team needs him most. But on a play when the ball was far away, Wade hooked his leg around Rondo and knocked him over awkwardly. While he was ostensibly protecting Rondo from chasing the ball, I thought it was an unnecessary non-basketball play and should have been called a flagrant foul. But it fit right in with the Heat’s pattern of physical, bullying play that bruised Ray Allen’s chest, knocked Rondo down repeatedly, and got the Celtics into foul trouble (along with a couple phantom technicals*) and was generally ignored by the officials.

*Is it weird to anyone else how little was mentioned about the flagrant foul on Jermaine O’Neal and technical on Pierce in game one that caused a five-point swing in the former case and an ejection in the latter, both of which were later rescinded by the league? I know the refs can’t be perfect, but something is wrong when two calls that have such an obvious effect on the outcome of the game are later admitted by the NBA to be wrong.

Some more thoughts on the series:

-I’m unlikely to watch the rest of the playoffs at this point. It’s a shame, because basketball is a great game, but it’s really being ruined for me by poor officiating and boring play from the Heat. I much prefer teams that run offenses, setting screens and making the extra pass, than teams who put it in one of two players’ hands and either jab-step and shoot a jumper or drive and expect a foul at worst.

-Where do the Celtics go from here? There’s lots of talk about “blowing up the core,” but this doesn’t make any sense to me. The Big Four are all signed at least through next year (when Garnett’s contract expires) so it makes sense to me to bring them back, see what Jermaine and Shaq O’Neal can offer, see what an offseason can do for Jeff Green’s teamwork and basketball IQ (and for the Big Three’s legs and other nagging injuries) and see what happens. At the end of the year, Garnett and Allen’s contracts expire, so GM Danny Ainge needs to again take a look at the team at the trading deadline and, if things don’t look promising, deal those expiring contracts for future pieces. I don’t have any delusions about the Celtics’ chances next year, but if enough things go right (Green matures, good health, some good bench additions through free agency or even the draft) they have as much shot as anyone.

Hey, at least they didn’t go down like the Lakers!

Starter: Ray Allen

If you follow my twitter (do it, I’m really interesting), know me personally, or were within earshot of the 02116 area code when I won my ticket, you’ll know that I had the amazing fortune of attending the Celtics/Lakers game last Thursday during which Ray Allen set the all-time record for three pointers made (though he still needs 63 more to match Reggie Miller’s record if the playoffs are included). I spent more money than I should have, but it was a perfect combination of events: Celtics vs. Lakers, Ray needing one three to tie the record, and Reggie Miller himself being in attendance as he was broadcasting the game for TNT. Since Ray is my favorite roundballer of all time, I had to go.

A lot of people are curious when I mention that Ray Allen is my favorite player, so I’ll explain why. First and foremost, he’s a fantastic player. Though he’s lost some ups, in his prime he may have been the best player pound-for-pound besides Allen Iverson, as he was not only a fantastic shooter, but an extremely quick driver and solid finisher at the rim. He has a high “basketball IQ,” plays great defense and really has few weaknesses on the court. I was discussing with a friend before the game how most three-point specialists don’t last very long because they can’t get open or play defense, and that his complete game is what makes Allen special and will likely make his record one that’s tough to top.

While I’m always hesitant to pass judgments on players’ personal lives, it seems like Ray has few weaknesses off the court as well. Every coach he’s had says he works harder than any player they’ve coached, he does plenty of charity work, and he just seems genuinely nice. I admired him on his previous teams at Connecticut, Milwaukee, and Seattle, and when he was acquired by my favorite team I was overjoyed.

After a multi-day quest to obtain a ticket, I got lucky and scored a 1st-row loge seat (Pro tip: I’ve had the best secondhand-ticket luck with ebay over Stubhub or a ticket broker). While it was in the corner, it was roughly 25 feet behind Ray’s Mom, so I was pretty happy with its location. And as you’re aware, Ray set the record in the first quarter, and the Garden erupted. The teams continued play through his tremendous standing ovation, and then when a foul was called Ray walked over and shook hands with Reggie Miller. At the end of the first quarter, he hugged Reggie, then hugged his Mom, and then his wife all while the crowd cheered their lungs out.

While the Celtics ended up losing the game, it was the best loss I’ve ever attended in person, and one of the best events of any sort I’ve been present for. Congrats to Ray. Though in typical Ray fashion, he gave this quote after the game: “It was a magical moment, being in this building. I felt a little embarrassed that there was so much attention surrounding this moment.”

He’s more focused on banner 18 than personal milestones, I’d say.

Super Bowl Preview

Vince LombarkyAlex: I’m still a little sour from the Patriots premature exit from the playoffs, so it’s been hard for me to get amped up for the game. That being said, fans of the sport have plenty to look forward to: two historic organizations, Dallas’s beautiful stadium, and perhaps the last game we’ll see in a while. At the beginning of the season, like the rest of the TNIB staff, I picked the Packers to win the Super Bowl, so I have to stick with them here, I’m thinking to the tune of 35-27 and I predict this will be the game that we remember Aaron Rodgers for at the end of his career. I also predict Alex Smith is sitting at home praying that during the game nobody mentions the time the Niners picked him number one while Rodgers fell into the 20s.

Patrick: I’m sticking with the Packers here. That will make my preseason prediction of a Packers Super Bowl win look pretty good, which I need because, like the rest of the TNIB staff, I was crazy wrong about the AFC. Here’s my prediction: Aaron Rodgers will throw for one million passing yards (give or take a few) and will have two rushing TDs to accompany his 23 passing TDs. Those number work out, right? He’ll also throw one interception, but he’ll do it on purpose. Rodgers will throw a pass directly at James Harrison so he can tackle Harrison and put on his wrestling title belt. 

The Packers will win by a score of 175-7. The Steelers lone TD will be a defensive touchdown scored on a fumble caused, recovered, and returned by Troy Polamalu because even though the Packers will win, Polamalu will always win the hair battle, no matter how glorious Clay Matthews’s hair might be.

Walt: The Packers are pretty much a lock for the “moral” victory award, but I think that’ll have to keep them warm during the cold, snowy Dallas night, because to the surprise of absolutely no one I’m picking the Steelers. Mostly out of pure homerism, but I’m also doing it because, dammit, I wasn’t at TNIB for the beginning-of-season picks and SOMEBODY needs to bring a little variety to these proceedings. Predictions: Pittsburgh will get off to a slow start when the entire O-line injures themselves during the coin toss, but receive a lucky break when Harrison decapitates Rodgers in the second quarter. He’ll be charged the first-ever on-field multi-million-dollar fine, which he’ll pay with spare change from his son’s piggy bank.

The Steelers will oversleep during their halftime nap and miss the third quarter completely, but hold Green Bay off and pull it out at the last second when Randle El completes the gadget play everyone’s been waiting for him to throw all season long. Pittsburgh takes it, 24-17, which everyone will complain about until Roethlisberger single-handedly prevents a lock-out and saves the next season, thereby making him a good person again in the eyes of the world.

Ian: Go Pack Go. Like Alex, I’m still sour from the Patriots’ loss, but the Packers have been my second favorite team since they jettisoned Bart Farve. I hadn’t been super-excited about the game, but Lil’ Wayne’s new freestyle called “Green and Yellow” actually got me pumped up (at least more than the Super Bowl Shuffle would have) and so now I’m ready.

As for the actual game, I can’t see the Steelers’ offensive line, especially without Maurkice Pouncey, holding back the front seven of Green Bay, especially B.J. Raji and Clay Matthews who may be the two best players in the NFL at their respective positions. Roethlisberger may be able to make things happen when his protection fails, but it’s likely that he’ll be so hassled that the Steelers won’t be able to do much on offense. On the other side of the ball, the Packers have so many weapons that they’re tough for any defense to stop, and with the emergence of James “Heart like John” Starks it’s tough to look past them for this game.

*Image courtesy of We’ll Never Forget You Brent

Why is Bill Belichick so Hated?

photo courtesy of Keith Allison via Creative Commons License

Ask any football fan outside New England (and some of those inside) what they think of Bill Belichick, and you’ll likely get one of the following responses:

“Cheater.”

“Jerk.”

“Arrogant.”

Take one look at fan sites like The Gang Green, or even in multiple national columns such as Gregg Easterbrook’s, and you’ll read the same kinds of things. Belichick is a ruthless competitor who runs up the score on his opponents. He cheated to get where he is and doesn’t deserve his three super bowl rings. And so on.

If you ask me, it’s because they’re jealous.

Think about it. Belichick has qualities that should be admired. He is extremely successful in a league designed to stop sustained success. He preaches hard work, teamwork, and professionalism (he could win 45-3 and still would tell the press that “there’s plenty of things to work on”), and if one of his players doesn’t follow the team system, they get benched (Brandon Meriweather) or let go (Adalius Thomas). His teams all compliment each other and their coach, and they all act professionally both on and off the field, at least more so than many other teams.

He’s also a brilliant strategist and has figured out how to exploit the NFL draft in his favor, repeatedly trading down for future picks while still getting the players he wants and eschewing the expensive, high-risk top ten picks except in rare cases. His drafting strategy has paid great dividends this year, as the team is getting fantastic contributions from lower draft picks like Devin McCourty (27th overall, acquired by trading down), Aaron Hernandez (113th overall), Rob Gronkowski (42nd overall), Brandon Spikes (62nd overall), Sebastian Vollmer (58th overall in 2009), not to mention signing undrafted Benjarvis Green-Ellis. With all the trades, the Patriots have extra picks in each of the first three rounds in the next draft, which should keep the team competitive essentially until Tom Brady retires.

But ask some people, and all this is invalidated because of Spygate. Now, I’m not going to break any new ground on Spygate, and that’s the problem. There are people who won’t be persuaded by facts and think that Belichick cheated in each of his Super Bowls when all he did was tape defensive signals in one game, a practice that Jimmy Johnson considered to be no big deal and one that was only publicized because the NFL had sent out a memo specifically telling teams not to do it (which suggests that it was previously somewhat widespread). No practices were taped, nor were the tapes in the Jets game (which set off the whole controversy) used in any fashion by the team (and of course, the Jets would change their signals before the next time they played since they knew their original signals were taped). And, since Spygate, the Patriots:

-were undefeated in 2007 until the Super Bowl

-went 11-5 in 2008 with a backup quarterback

-went 10-6 in 2009

-are 14-2 this year.

I can think of two reasons for the universal hate for Bill Belichick and the staying power of the Spygate myth:

1. Everyone is unreasonable and can’t follow basic logic.

2. Everyone is jealous of the Patriots’ success and continually strains really hard to find a reason to invalidate their success. “Brady’s hair” falls in this category as well.

I can understand hating a team because they’re your main rival. So Jets and Dolphins fans, you’re allowed to hate the Patriots. I can understand hating a team if they showboat, trash talk, or act unprofessionally on or off the field. That’s why I hate the Ravens, Jets, Chargers, and (most of) the Steelers. I can understand hating a team because of their fans (Cowboys, Eagles) but every team has obnoxious fans. And I’m in the minority on this, but I extend my dislike of particular teams to ones with owners who swindle cities and use public money to build themselves billion-dollar stadiums (Yankees) or as a temple for their religious beliefs (Colorado Rockies). But if there’s an opposing team who plays the game the right way, doesn’t show off, doesn’t talk trash, doesn’t assault women, and isn’t involved in shady off-field incidents, but is highly successful, like, say, the Indianapolis Colts, I find it pretty hard to hate them. So why is it so hard for the entire country when it comes to Bill Belichick and the New England Patriots?

(Source: flickr.com)

Projecting the Red Sox

As I fire up the ol’ computer to write this article, I have five tabs open in my browser from last night: Sons of Sam Horn, the best sports message board on the internet; Fangraphs; MLB Trade Rumors; and the Baseball-Reference pages for Russell Martin, Carl Crawford (for obvious reasons), and Roberto Clemente (because I was getting ahead of myself and comparing Crawford’s career to Clemente’s [it’s not as good]). I wonder what I was doing last night?

Yeah, I was thinking about the Red Sox and Carl Crawford. The contracts may be a slight overpay, but Carl Crawford and Adrian Gonzalez add so much to the Red Sox that it’s tough not to get very excited about their chances this year. Adrian Gonzalez is a premier hitter with great opposite-field power, and he’s going to play with the Green Monster 310 feet away from him. Crawford may not have home run power, but he can lace hits to the gaps and his speed can turn them into doubles and triples. And even though the Monster offsets the value of his defense somewhat, he is consistently worth 10-15 runs per season in the field, which goes a long way toward making him worth his contract.

I’m quite excited about the possibilities for this team. Since I couldn’t think about anything other than baseball all day, I decided to run some back-of-the-envelope projections for the team. The pitching staff is still somewhat in flux, though I expect them to pick up a reliever or two (Scott Downs is looking likely now that they are already losing their first round pick). It has the talent to be better than average, but given the new pitching coach and thus far no major bullpen upgrades, let’s project it as league average. Last year this was around 716 runs per team. The Red Sox were slightly below average at 744 runs allowed. So for ease in calculation, since we’re estimating and I want to be conservative, let’s project them to allow 720.

Offensively, I took the Bill James projections, which are available on Fangraphs, and input them to BaseballMusings lineup run generator, which is a very neat tool. As James’s projections are known to be optimistic, I adjusted them mostly downward, except for a few cases as explained below.

Leadoff: Jacoby Ellsbury, center field.
Jacoby had a tough year last year, and many question what he’ll be able to do next year. But for now the Red Sox still have Mike Cameron, who is great against lefties and also one of the best center fielders of my lifetime when not in pain from a kidney stone. Bill James projects Ellsbury to have an OBP of .355 and a SLG of .409. Since Cameron would probably play any center field innings that Ellsbury isn’t in the lineup, I’m comfortable with these projections, but in the interest of being conservative, let’s adjust them down to .350/.400.

2nd: Dustin Pedroia, second base.
Pedroia was having a very solid year before going down with a broken foot. He had a .367 OBP and a career high .493 SLG when injured. James projects him to hit .372/.462, which seems fair, but given that he may miss ten games (likely replaced by Lowrie or Scutaro) and maybe is off his game because of the injury, we’ll drop it down to .360/.450.

3rd: Carl Crawford, left field.
Crawford is an excellent hitter, but he’s not exactly built for Fenway. There’s also question about whether his last two years (during which he increased his walk rate and slugged .473) represents his true hitting level, or if a little less power than that should be expected. James projects him at .350/.453, which seems pessimistic to me, but I’ll use it.

Cleanup: Adrian Gonzalez, first base.
Here’s where I took some liberty in adapting Bill James’s projections. James projects Adrian Gonzalez to hit for a .378/.512 line, which seems very pessimistic to me. I think it’s possible that that projection is assuming he’d remain in San Diego, in which case it makes sense to adjust it upward. Using the wisdom of crowds, the 40 fangraphs users who have voted thus far project him at a .400/.595 line, which seems maybe a bit too optimistic. But given that he’s hit about that well away from Petco Park in his last three years, and Fenway seems like a park built for him, maybe it’s not too crazy. We’ll take the middle ground, but the high end: .390/.580.

Fifth: Kevin Youkilis, third base.
Youkilis has been one of the most underrated hitters in the majors for the last few years. His fierce playing style can cause him to miss time, but on a per-at-bat basis here’s how he ranks in the majors since 2008 (minimum 1200 PA):
OBP: 5th
SLG: 3rd
wOBA: 2nd, to Pujols

It’s not hard to make the case that Youkilis is the second-best hitter in the majors, per at-bat. Not only does he have amazing patience, but he has surprising power. While Fenway has helped him a lot, he would be a solid hitter in any park and as the Red Sox #5 guy, you know this is an exceptional lineup.

James projects him for a .398/.507 line. That slugging looks low to me, but I can foresee the scenario in which Youk misses 20 or so games very easily, and those at-bats would probably be taken by Jed Lowrie. While I love Lowrie’s bat, he’s not quite at Youk’s level, especially in the plate discipline department. So let’s call this position an aggregate .385/.520.

6th: David Ortiz (and platoon partner?), designated hitter.
In the same time frame that Youkilis is the second-best hitter in baseball, Ortiz has had some well-publicized struggles. But he still has a .498 slugging percentage during that time, good for 32nd in the majors (just behind Jason Bay). His wOBA makes him 52nd in MLB during that time. This isn’t great, but it would look better if he played less often against lefties, against whom he only managed a .275 OBP and .324 SLG in 2010. This is a continuing trend, and I expect Terry Francona (and Ortiz) to realize this and sit Ortiz more often than not against LHP. Against LHP, the likely DH would be Mike Cameron, who has a career .866 OPS against lefties, or if Russell Martin or another catcher is acquired, Jason Varitek could even DH against lefties.

James projects Ortiz for a .366/.509 line, and given his likely solid platoon partners, let’s call it a .365/.505 aggregate from the DH slot this year.

7th: JD Drew, Right Field.
2011 is the last year of JD Drew’s contract, and he had a rough 2010. After adjusting to the American League and posting a .399/.521 line for an OPS of .920 from 2008-09, he could only manage .341/.452 last year (.793 OPS) and has hinted at retiring after this year. But James projects him for somewhat of a rebound year and a .370/.460 line, so we’ll go with that. Though Drew likes to miss time, his backups are likely to be Ellsbury, Ryan Kalish, or Cameron, who won’t do much worse. So we’ll go with a .360/.455 projection from right field.

8th: Marco Scutaro/Jed Lowrie, shortstop.
As I wrote in my offseason preview, I think Lowrie will be the starting shortstop sooner or later (I’d guess around May), while Scutaro will become a super-sub at third, second, and short. James projects Lowrie at .361/.467, and while I think he could very easily improve on that mark, let’s not get too hasty. We’ll do .360/.460.

9th: Jarrod Saltalamacchia/Jason Varitek/Russell Martin, catcher.
As I noted in my last post, just Saltalamcchia and Varitek could make for a solid catching tandem, given their complimentary platoon splits and Varitek’s experience. Given the rumors about how the Red Sox weren’t happy with Victor Martinez’s dedication to the pitching staff, I think they’ll mostly be looking for defense from this spot, but Saltalamacchia’s youth gives me hope that this can be more than an offensive black hole. James likes Salty for a .323/.422 line, and gives Varitek a .324/.386 mark. Let’s call it .325/.400.

Plugging all this into the lineup analysis tool, we get a projection of: 5.722 runs per game.

Holy crap. That works out to 927 runs for the whole season, which would be 109 more runs than last year. Is that possible? Considering that they added two all-star hitters (though, yes, one replaced an all-star) and will get three other all-stars back after missing them for half to all the year (including the man who has been the best hitter not named Pujols for the last three years), then, yes. Not to mention that the lineup model assumes the team has average speed, and the Red Sox have the two best base-stealers in the league.

Still, let’s be conservative. Say on a team level this lineup estimator is optimistic, and maybe the Red Sox have some bad luck with runners in scoring position or something. So say they only score 910 runs.

With an average number of runs allowed discussed above, that projects (via the pythagorean expectation, using 1.83 as an exponent) to a 98-64 record.

Given how conservative I was in all my estimates and the ability of the pitching staff to improve upon my projection (especially with the likely bullpen help they will add and the improved defense), I’m very excited about the 2011 Red Sox.

*Photo courtesy of Albert Yau via Creative Commons License

Theo’s Plan II: Not a Bridge Year

Welcome to my second annual Red Sox offseason preview. Guess what? I was relatively correct last time I did this, as I predicted the addition of Beltre and Cameron, touched on the decline of Papelbon, and noted that Jed Lowrie is good if healthy. Not to toot my own horn, but…I’ll toot my own horn.

So far the Sox have made three major moves, all of which I agree with. First, after John Farrell left his role as pitching coach to become Toronto’s manager, they signed Curt Young from Oakland to be the new Red Sox pitching coach. Generally, pitching coaches are overrated—they seem to get too much credit for any success stories that occur under their tutelage, and get too much blame when a pitcher experiences a decline in performance. Farrell is a good example of this, as he is credited with Jon Lester and Clay Buchholz’s success after their first couple years had some rough stretches, when the fact is that they have been great pitchers since they were in high school and it seemed like only a matter of time before they adjusted to pitching in the majors*. Similarly, he was given lots of blame for the perceived underperformance of Josh Beckett, John Lackey, and Daisuke Matsuzaka, when there are other reasonable explanations for each player’s decline (Lackey adjusting to a new ballpark and division, Beckett’s conditioning, and Dice-K’s injuries and stubbornness). Therefore, I wasn’t too worried when the news came that Farrell was leaving, as I expected any new coach the Red Sox management decided on to be a solid one, given the collective knowledge of the coaching staff already in place and the immense talent of the pitching staff. That said, I doubt one could find a better option to take over than Young, since he already knows and has a good relationship with Francona and has shown excellent results in his previous work in Oakland.

*I do think Farrell deserves credit for the unexpected strong performance of Hideki Okajima, since he was the one who got him to perfect and throw his “Oki-Doki.”

Second, the team picked up their option on Scott Atchison. Atchison isn’t going to be the savior of the bullpen, but for $40k more than the league minimum salary, he’s a solid cheap option at the back of the staff. If he collapses, there’s no harm in cutting him, but he should be a good bet to repeat his 2010 performance and picking up the option is a no-brainer.

Third, the team picked up David Ortiz’s 2011 option, worth $12.5 million. This move caused some derision in Red Sox world. The panel at the recent Blogapalooza I attended seemed to be mostly against it, saying that it was too much money, that full-time DHs were on their way out and that Ortiz was likely to decline further and his “April slump,” which has occurred each of the last two seasons, was a foregone conclusion and likely to increase in length next year. Also, there were insinuations that he wasn’t really 36, even though after 9/11 there have been very few cases of players faking their ages. Vlad Guerrero’s 2010 contract was brought up as something closer to what Ortiz is really worth ($6.5 million, plus a mutual option for 2011 with a $1 mil buyout—so essentially $7.5 mil). And they’re probably close to right, though Ortiz did hit for a .899 OPS (eighth in the league) while Vlad only managed a .841 after a hot start. Except for one thing—it’s David Ortiz we’re talking about. I’ll be the first one to discount the impact of chemistry, but if you can find me anyone in Boston who has said something bad about Ortiz as a person, it’ll be the first one. Paying an extra $5 mil or so to keep an icon happy isn’t necessarily a bad deal, and he’s not hurting you at the plate either.

So, where should they go from here? Like last year’s post, I’ve organized it into steps.

1. Re-sign Adrian Beltre.
Last year, I stated that signing the free agent Beltre should be the Red Sox’s top priority as he was likely to provide around an .850 OPS in Fenway, he was the best third baseman in the league defensively, and there were very few other palatable options for the position in the near future. I would have signed him to a multi-year deal then, but given his recent injury history the one-year “make good” contract he ended up signing made sense to minimize risk. Except when I (and the Red Sox) were right and Beltre had a great year offensively, he obviously turned down the player option for 2011 and became a free agent, putting the Red Sox in the position of bidding against other teams for his services.

So, we’re in a similar position to last year. Beltre is again the best third baseman on the market. His good offensive season surprised a lot of people, but could have been foreseen by an astute observer, so not much has changed there. And again, if they don’t sign Beltre, the backup plan for third base is less than ideal.

What the other options? They could acquire a first baseman and move Youkilis to third, but Youkilis is another year removed from playing third with any regularity, and if they don’t add a top first baseman they’d be looking at a serious downgrade. Jed Lowrie played incredibly well after recovering from mononucleosis, and while his injury history is mostly one bad injury (the broken bone in his wrist in 2008) and bad luck (the aforementioned mono), he would be more valuable as the team’s shortstop, where he has more experience (more on that later). Beyond that, the Sox would need to trade for a third baseman or sign a lesser free agent, and the pickings there are very slim.

Beltre is likely to command at least a three-year deal, but he’s only 31 right now, so giving him even four guaranteed years shouldn’t be a major concern. Apart from 2009, he has remained healthy, and has always hit well outside of Seattle. While a repeat of 2010 or 2004 offensively is unlikely, it’s not out of the question that he could come close, as Seattle does have the most difficult travel schedule in baseball and one of the most brutal parks for right-handers to hit in. Given the Mariners’ complete ineptitude at the plate the last few years, maybe there’s something wrong with the coaching or training staff there as well. At the least, it didn’t work for Beltre.

In 2007, the Red Sox gave Mike Lowell a three-year deal at $12.5 mil a year for the seasons when he was age 34-36. That contract didn’t work out, but it shows that the Red Sox aren’t averse to giving multiple years to 34-year-old third basemen who provide good defense and whose swing is perfect for Fenway. Beltre will be just 32 next year and is a better player than Lowell. The “Contract Crowdsourcing” feature over at Fangraphs estimates that Beltre will get a four-year, $52 million deal. Given the dearth of other options, I might start with that, but would be willing to offer a four-year deal worth $60 million and be 100% happy if he signed it.

2. Give Jed Lowrie the starting shortstop job.
Jed Lowrie will be the best shortstop in the American League this season. Lots of people may think this is a crazy statement, but it’s not. Let’s examine.

First, it’s not too difficult right now to be the best shortstop in the American league. Last year the best-hitting AL shortstop by OPS (among those who qualified for the batting title) was Alexei Ramirez of Chicago, who put up a .744 OPS. Marco Scutaro was second on this list, and he played with a hurt shoulder for much of the year. Across the league, all shortstops hit for just a .669 OPS. There are some great shortstops in the NL, and a few AL guys look to be on their way up, but right now, if you have a guy who can field well and get on base every once in a while, you should consider yourself lucky.

What did Jed Lowrie hit last year? Oh, just a .907 OPS in 197 plate appearances.

Which brings me to my second point: Jed Lowrie is a pretty good hitter. There are two big myths about Jed Lowrie that I’d like to dispel. First, that his 2010 production came out of nowhere. Second, that he is injury-prone. The two are related.

In 2008, Lowrie was a reasonably well-regarded prospect who had worked his way slowly but surely up the system. He switched from second base to shortstop, which slowed his development some, and also had an ankle injury in 2006, though he still played 97 games. In 2007 he had hit quite well at three levels, culminating in a .862 OPS at Pawtucket and a #73 ranking on Baseball America’s top prospect list. He injured his wrist in Pawtucket in May, but was able to keep playing, and when Julio Lugo got hurt he was called up to the Red Sox and more or less played every day for the rest of the season. The wrist continued to bother him more and more, but since he was the Red Sox’s best option at short beyond Alex Cora, he stayed on the field and helped the Red Sox reach the playoffs.

After the season the news came out that Lowrie had actually broken a bone in his wrist and this had severely hampered his hitting, particularly from the left side of the plate. He didn’t have surgery, but the wrist still bothered him when he began play the next year and he had to be shut down and undergo surgery, so 2009 was essentially a lost year. In spring training of 2010, hopes were high for him as he was completely recovered from the wrist injury, but he unfortunately came down with mono, and had to miss about half the year.

So that’s Lowrie’s injury history. He essentially has had just one bad injury, which he’s fully recovered from, and one disease, which he’s also shown he’s fully recovered from. Now, the case can be made that guys who get injuries from playing “balls-to-the-wall” are injury-prone, as are guys who have a lot of muscle pulls, and maybe guys who take poor care of themselves. But Lowrie is none of those things. Simiarly, players who have reputations as being “injury-prone” are often guys like J.D. Drew and (maybe) Ellsbury this year who show a tendency to not play through injuries. Everyone gets banged up during the season, but Drew often needs to take a few games off here and there after pulling a muscle, or with a sore shoulder. People argue that he should be playing through these injuries (which I disagree with) and be more like Ripken, who was (likely) banged up a lot during his streak, but was a “gamer” and stayed on the field.

Most players who played through an injury and helped their team to a playoff berth when the other options to play their (important) position were poor would get a reputation as a gamer and garner lots of deserved accolades. Somehow Jed Lowrie has gained a reputation for being injury-prone, even though if he had told Francona in 2008, “Sorry, Tito, my wrist hurts too much, I gotta sit” he would have likely healed faster/better and had a more normal career path.

I’m confused about this perception. Lowrie should remain healthy, and while he is probably not going to put up a .900 OPS for a whole season, he seemed to only get stronger as the season went on and he was essentially playing every day by September. While he wasn’t rated a top prospect by the magazines, neither were Kevin Youkilis or Dustin Pedroia, or for that matter Jon Lester, and they produced well at the major league level. I have a theory that the Red Sox focus less on the results of their prospects and more on the process—that is, they have their prospects work on certain things in the minors (Lowrie and Pedroia’s defense, Lester’s secondary pitches) and promote them based on their progress and reports from coaches rather than just on numbers. That might cause someone creating a prospect list to underrate them since they don’t know that the player is focusing on particular aspects of his game. Either that, or the Red Sox like to draft late bloomers.

3. Let Victor Martinez go elsewhere.
Victor Martinez is a solid catcher. He’s an excellent hitter and seems to be serviceable defensively. He’s not great at throwing runners out but does an OK job, and similarly, he’s not great at blocking balls in the dirt but isn’t a major liability back there. Whether or not he’s a good pitch-caller is tougher to figure out, as C.C. Sabathia and Cliff Lee did pretty well in Cleveland with him, as did Lester and Buchholz this year, but Lackey, Beckett, and Dice-K underperformed.

Anyway, it would be great to have Victor Martinez on the Red Sox in 2011 and 2012. But by 2013, he’s not likely to be able to catch very often, and even if he can, his defense is likely to have deteriorated further. And his bat is great for a catcher, but isn’t exceptional, and is unimpressive for a first baseman or DH. Given that he’s likely to receive at least a three-year deal and is a type A free agent, it would be a wise move to let him sign elsewhere, save the $10 million he’s likely to make, take the two draft picks, and not risk paying him through a likely decline.

The best argument for re-signing Martinez is that they don’t have a good replacement in-house. There options at catcher are Jason Varitek, who had a strong start in 2010 before missing most of the year with a broken foot or Jarrod Saltalamacchia, who has shown great offensive potential, but struggled to stick in the majors, first in Atlanta and then in Texas. Beyond those guys, they’d have to sign a free agent or promote a prospect, and while they have some strong catching prospects in their system, none of them seem to be MLB-ready yet.

Fortunately for the Sox, the MLB catchers they currently have have complimentary platoon splits. Varitek is still a solid hitter against lefties, as he posted a .868 OPS last year, an .807 OPS in 2009, and an .863 OPS against lefties in 2008—all years in which he struggled against righties. Saltalamacchia has a career .765 OPS against righties, which isn’t great, but if the two can combine for an OPS in the high .700s, that would make catching a strong point offensively, as just six catchers with over 100 PAs hit for an .800 OPS last year.

Outside the organization, there are some options, but none seem to be a perfect fit. John Buck would be a good stopgap signing, as the free agent put up a .487 slugging percentage over the last two years and as a type B free agent wouldn’t require the Sox to relinquish any draft picks. The problem with signing Buck is that he’d likely want the starting job, which he deserves, but which could stunt the development of Saltalamacchia and probably force the Sox to cut ties with Varitek, since it’s unlikely they’d carry three catchers when two of them can’t play another position (though I wish that were an option teams would explore more seriously instead of having 12 pitchers).

Through trade, the Red Sox have eyed some targets in the past, such as the Rockies’ Chris Iannetta or the Diamondbacks’ Miguel Montero, but neither of those appear to be a good fit now, as their respective teams have showed a renewed enthusiasm for them. At this point, it seems that either trade would require a top Red Sox prospect, and I don’t see that happening.

It probably makes the most sense to let Martinez sign elsewhere, stand pat with Saltalamacchia and Varitek, sign some AAAA guy as an emergency backup, and hope for the best. While this isn’t the sexiest choice (though NESN reporter Heidi Watney, who was rumored to have dated Tek, may disagree), it would likely give the team solid production, keep them from being locked in a long contract, and allow them to spend money elsewhere. Keeping Varitek around would not only keep a Red Sox legend happy, but if the Captain’s famous “computer brain” is what it’s cracked up to be, the pitching staff and Saltalamacchia’s development should be aided.

4. Bolster the bullpen.
While the injuries to the team did far more damage to the 2010 Red Sox, it certainly seemed like the bullpen was a bigger problem. Going into the season, they looked relatively solid. Jonathan Papelbon had shown some weaknesses in 2009 and had blown a save in their final game of the year (as I noted), but he was a top closer and was expected to rebound. Daniel Bard had had a sensational rookie season and looked to build upon that as the team’s set-up man. Beyond that, Hideki Okajima and Ramon Ramirez had always been solid, and they had the mercurial but talented Manny Delcarmen. They also added some lottery tickets in Dustin Richardson, Scott Atchison, Scott Schoenweis, and Boof Bonser, and as always had Tim Wakefield ready to fill a role in the pen or the rotation as necessary.

As with their injury problems, nearly everything that could go wrong did. Papelbon pitched about the same as he had in 2009, but his meltdowns seemed to come in tie or one-run games instead of ones in which he had more wiggle room. Hideki Okajima imploded, putting up a 6.00 ERA in the first half, and beyond Dan Bard, no one picked up the slack, and both Ramirez and Delcarmen were jettisoned to the National League, a.k.a. “Where Red Sox flameouts go to thrive.” Okajima improved in the second half, but Bard was less dominant, likely due to being somewhat overworked as the Sox’ only reliable 7th-8th inning option.

All in all, the Red Sox bullpen pitched 445 innings with a 4.24 ERA and was charged with 23 losses. Their 4.59 RA was 11th in the AL, and while blown saves aren’t the best measure of effectiveness, they were second only to Baltimore in this category. Beyond Bard, there wasn’t much good news there.

Where should they go from here? Well, Bard will be back and should anchor the pen. Papelbon is going to earn a lot of money in his final year of arbitration, so a trade is unlikely, and while he’s not likely to be worth the money he’ll make, he should be a solid pitcher. While his ERA jumped from 1.85 to 3.90, Papelbon’s peripherals remained consistent and he can be confidently projected for around a 3.00 ERA—not top-of-the-line stuff, but given that the closer often doesn’t pitch in the highest leverage situations, it can be advantageous for a team to have its set-up relievers be better than its closer while the closer pitches the 9th with a three-run lead (a lead that nearly any major league pitcher should be able to protect most of the time). Scott Atchison’s option has been picked up, and he’ll be a cheap arm for the 6th or 7th option in the pen. As noted, Hideki Okajima pitched well down the stretch and was re-signed for $2.75 mil. One would think that given his struggles last year, he won’t be given as many opportunities to lose games if he can’t regain his form. In the minors, they have a couple AAAA guys with promise in Fernando Cabrera and Robert Manuel, but neither have impressed in the cups of coffee they’ve been given thus far. They also have some starting pitching prospects who pitched out of the bullpen last year in Felix Doubrount and Michael Bowden, but the team hasn’t given up on them being starters, so they’re only likely to see the Fenway pen in an emergency. That’s all. So here’s where we stand:

Closer: Papelbon
Set-up: Bard
LHP: Okajima
RHP: Atchison
Other options: Wakefield, Michael Bowden, Felix Doubrount.

It’s not a bad start, but they could use some help. Fortunately, there are a lot of relievers on the free agent market. Normally, signing free agent relievers is a poor move, as they are very unpredictable and it’s often possible to get good relievers for free or cheap, rather than giving them guaranteed contracts. And signing type A free agents is almost always a bad idea; it’s not worth guaranteeing a bunch of money to a reliever as well as giving up a draft pick. For a team like this year’s Red Sox, who are strong all across the diamond and have some money to spend, adding a few free agent relievers could be the right choice to solidify the bullpen. Here’s who I’d target:

- Joaquin Benoit. Benoit has battled injuries during his career, but when healthy has always had great stuff. He was one of the best relievers in the league last year for Tampa Bay. He put up a 1.34 ERA and had a fantastic 75/11 K/BB ratio in 60 IP. He allowed six HR, but did almost everything else right and is a great target. Best of all, he wouldn’t require giving up a draft pick. He may be looking for closer money, but given his injury history he may not get more than a two-year offer, and if that’s what it takes then the Sox should pounce.

- J.J. Putz. Putz, like Benoit, has a significant injury history, but was healthy last year. Here’s a good breakdown of the pros and cons of Putz. Since he was once a closer, he may be more likely to get an offer from somewhere to be a closer, so this seems a less likely option than Benoit.

Others to consider: Jon Rauch, Koji Uehara, and Brian Fuentes.

Ideally the Red Sox would sign two of these guys, giving them a strong bullpen and allowing any “lottery tickets” they pick up to avoid being forced into action.

5. Don’t trade for Adrian Gonzalez.
I’m sure you’ve read myriad rumors about Adrian Gonzalez being on the market and how attractive he is for the Red Sox. I don’t see it happening for two main reasons.

First, it doesn’t make sense for the Padres. San Diego came within one game of the playoffs last year, and most of their pieces are returning. They saw the team who beat them out win the World Series. Now, no one expected them to be so competitive last year, but I don’t think anyone had the Giants winning the series either. Essentially, the division is up for grabs and the Padres have as good a chance as anyone at taking it. Now, I know San Diego is not very likely to re-sign Gonzalez, but if they hold onto him for the upcoming season, they have a good chance at the playoffs, and even if they let him go they will get two draft picks for him. If they don’t like their chances at the trading deadline, they can trade him then—look at the haul the Rangers got for Mark Teixiera in a very similar situation (Neftali Feliz, Elvis Andrus, Matt Harrison, and Jarrod Saltalamacchia, if you forgot). And given that he is from the area, they must have some hope of re-signing him, even though they’re not likely to be able to afford such a commitment. So I see the Padres holding onto Gonzalez until at least the trading deadline, and even then not letting him go for cheap.

Second, it doesn’t make sense for the Red Sox, at least not right now. Yes, he would hit well in Fenway and is a good long-term fit for the team. But for 2010, they still have David Ortiz and Kevin Youkilis, and Saltalamacchia can also fill in at first. Yes, Youkilis could move to third, but his defense there isn’t as good as at first and it’s only going to get worse as he gets older. Plus, Adrian Beltre is a much better fit at third, or even Jed Lowrie. Finally, since Gonzalez is going to be a free agent after this season, it makes just as much sense to wait and then just give up a draft pick to sign him instead of having to give up top prospects like Casey Kelly or even a major league player like Jacoby Ellsbury. While they’d have a period of time to negotiate with Gonzalez exclusively, they’re not likely to get a significant discount over simply signing him as a free agent.

Also, I think Kevin Youkilis is underappreciated by the fans who are clamoring to add Gonzalez. Youkilis’s hard-nosed style has caused some injuries (though his thumb injury last year seems like a freak thing), but when healthy he has been neck-and-neck with Mark Teixeira as the best all-around first baseman in the league. He can play defense, hit for average, and while we all know he’s patient, he has underrated power, hitting for a .560 slugging percentage the last three years combined. (For reference, Jason Bay, the “big bat” the Sox were missing last year, has never had a slugging percentage that high in a single season.)

If the Sox want A-Gon, they have a great shot at him in the 2011 offseason, and by then they won’t have David Ortiz under contract. But for 2010, there’s no space for Gonzalez without passing on a better option.

6. Otherwise: Stand Pat.
It’s not a stretch to say that the Red Sox lost ten wins to injuries last year. Pedroia and Youkilis missed half the season and are conservatively worth about 4-5 wins above replacement per year. Jacoby Ellsbury missed almost the entire year and could be conservatively projected to be worth around three wins. Adding in the time missed by Jason Varitek and Victor Martinez brings the total above ten wins and that’s before accounting for Mike Cameron and the pitchers who missed time. Given that the team won 89 games with all its injuries, it seems like bringing most of the same team back would give them a great shot at 95-100 wins and the playoffs, given a normal amount of injuries.

Beyond Beltre and Martinez, shortstop, and the bullpen, which they have to make decisions on, Theo should stand pat and let his team play. Players like Jayson Werth and Carl Crawford are attractive, but are likely to receive huge contracts and the Red Sox have solid, if not great, in-house options in Ellsbury, Cameron, and 2010’s surprising rookie Ryan Kalish. Cliff Lee would be nice to have (and to keep away from the Yankees) but would again require a huge salary commitment, and in this case would require the trade of a starter. Simply re-signing Beltre, giving Lowrie the shortstop job, adding pieces to the bullpen and bolstering the depth should make the 2011 Red Sox once again a good bet for 95-100 wins and a playoff berth.

**Photo courtesy of Chuck Welch via Creative Commons License

NFL Picks: Midseason Check-up

Alex: It looks like we were right about the west divisions being a crap shoot. In the AFC, the Chargers look like a mess, but after pulling out a win against Tennessee, I won’t rule out their typical second half surge, especially with Vincent Jackson’s return on the horizon. A record of 9-7 could win the division. In the NFC, I stand by my selection of Seattle, especially since 8-8 could win over there. What I feel great about is that I was the only one to pick the Steelers, Giants, and Falcons to all win their divisions. I also feel good about the Patriots, though omitting the Jets from the playoffs could prove to be an oversight, but somebody good is going to miss the AFC playoffs. My NFC wild card picks, however, are a mess. I totally whiffed on the Cowboys; I should’ve known better. They have an awful secondary and the worst O-line in the NFL. The Lions, however, I insist would’ve been in the mix had Stafford and others not gotten hurt, and for you gamblers out there, the Lions, while only 2-5, are 6-1 against the spread.

Patrick: Not too bad with my picks, I guess. If last week’s game against the Steelers was any indication, the Saints are about to pick things up and, most importantly, play defense like we all know they can. I probably shouldn’t have picked the Bengals, but whatever. As much of a mess as that team is, I’ll still root for a team with both Ochocinco and Terrell Owens. That’s just fun. Also, Dhani Jones wears really fly bow ties. At least I picked the Ravens for one of the wildcard spots. Either them or the Steelers will win that division, while the other gets one of the wildcards. I was dead wrong about the Panthers also, but that’s okay because I feel like the Bucs have a real shot at one of the NFC wildcards. I hope that happens, because then maybe someone in Florida will finally be able to watch a Bucs game on TV. I still feel good about the Rams taking the NFC West because the Seahawks and everyone else in that division couldn’t beat the 1-8 WSU Cougars. I propose we give the NFC West division to the AFC West, and let the Chiefs and Raiders both make the playoffs.

Ian: This is a mess. I think I can get a pass for the Cowboys and Vikings picks, as they have the talent, but complete breakdowns due to penalties and poor coaching are pretty hard to predict. I’d like to assume that if someone is one of the lucky 32 who gets to be an NFL head coach that they kinda know what they’re doing. But I have no excuse for my Broncos and 49ers picks other than “The divisions are awful, so it’s a crapshoot” and “Hey, I picked Bradford in the TNIIB Fantasy league.” I guess six of my picks have a shot. I don’t have much faith in the Bengals or Redskins either.

World Series Preview

Welcome to my World Series preview. Since the Red Sox missed the playoffs for the first time in a few years I’ve had the chance to watch the playoffs as a slightly dispassionate fan; that is, I didn’t have a horse in the race. While I was rooting against the Yankees, I am far from a Rangers fan, and while Tim Lincecum is one of my favorite non-Red Sox players, and the Giants have a place in my heart, it’s tough to get excited about a team relying on Aubrey Huff and Pat Burrell as their best hitters. So let’s get into the meat here.

I already covered the Rangers in my previous post, but something I’d like to point out is that their bullpen, which is being referred to as a weakness given its collapse in game one against NY, has actually been a strength so far. Going forward, it should be expected to perform even better in the World Series than it has previously in the playoffs. Here’s the postseason numbers:
v. TBR: 13 2/3 IP, 8 ER, 16 H, 5 BB, 15 K
v. NYY: 16 IP, 4 ER, 10 H, 12 BB, 15 K
Total postseason: 3.64 ERA, 7.89 H/9, 5.16 BB/9, 9.1 K/9.

Hey, that’s pretty good. But it’s not as good as the regular season performance from the top of the pen (Feliz, Oliver, O’Day, and Ogando all had ERAs of 2.73 or lower, with good peripherals to support them). And it’s even better when you consider that four of those runs came from Darren Oliver, who is likely to fall out of favor as he’s not looked good, and three more of the runs came during Game 1 against New York, a game that was grossly mismanaged by Ron Washington.

What else do the Rangers have? Well, Josh Hamilton looks like he’s relatively healthy, which is a boon for Texas. The rest of the team is hitting too, with the notable exception of Vlad Guererro. And they have Cliff Lee, which makes up for their disadvantage at the back end of the rotation (Tommy Hunter having turned in an awful performance in Game 4). They made some glaring defensive mistakes against New York, but during the regular season were fifth in defensive efficiency, so I would expect their defense to be solid overall.

As for the Giants, they don’t have nearly the amount of offensive firepower that the Rangers have. Cody Ross is absolutely on fire, but no one else on the team had better than a .760 OPS in the Phillies series, and they only pushed across 19 runs in the six games. When you remove the Joe Blanton-started game, it’s even worse—just 13 runs in five games, or 2.6 per game. That won’t cut it against the Rangers, and while Lincecum and Cain are very good, the Rangers aren’t as lefty-heavy as the Phillies and it’s unlikely they’ll be stifled by Jonathan Sanchez or Madison Bumgarner.

Nor is their bullpen particularly impressive. Brian Wilson is excellent, but Ramon Ramirez may have lost whatever was carrying him down the stretch, and while Javier Lopez pitched well, it’s tough to rely on him. Sergio Romo and Santiago Casilla are good, but the bullpen isn’t quite a strength for San Francisco.

But the Giants have one of the best pitching rotations in the league. Lincecum, Cain, and Sanchez are all capable of having no-hit stuff every night, and are very reliable. Madison Bumgarner is the best #4 starter in these playoffs, and I was surprised he was removed so quickly in his Game 4 start.

What I think this series will come down to are the two games that Cliff Lee starts. If the Giants can win one of them, whether by a fluke or by Lincecum pitching even better than Lee, then they are the favorite to win the series. But if Lee continues his seeming untouchability, it’s tough to pick against the Rangers, given their offensive and bullpen superiority. Since Lee hasn’t really shown anything in his postseason career that suggests he is vulnerable, I have to pick Texas in this one.

Rangers in 6, as Lee outduels Lincecum twice and then wins Game 6 in extra innings as their bullpen outperforms the Giants’.

Themed by Hunson and Five Gorillas